I love the simplicity and purity of this name and idea.
The graphics of both need refining/work. They are both a bit rough/crude at the moment. The raindrop and relationship with the O is poor/uncomfortable.
Think sophistication, purity, heaven...
Look at relationship of sizes/scale. The Right version is preferable to the left, looks more like a raindrop but refine it.
How might it be animated in advertising, web use? Can it be 3 dimentional, embossed, used as a sign?
Can it be even more 'heavenly', glowing? or reflective using silver metallic foil or matt and gloss UV varnish effects?
Or matt etching on a gloss glass bottle or vice-versa?
3 Comments:
je distingue deux choses : le nom, sa forme
le nom, je suis ok.
la forme, pour le moment n'est pas gérée, même si il y a une idée...
n'oubliez pas le travail global sur l'expression de la pluie, les stries, le fond de pluie, sur lequel vous posez cette marque.
I love the simplicity and purity of this name and idea.
The graphics of both need refining/work. They are both a bit rough/crude at the moment.
The raindrop and relationship with the O is poor/uncomfortable.
Think sophistication, purity, heaven...
Look at relationship of sizes/scale. The Right version is preferable to the left, looks more like a raindrop but refine it.
How might it be animated in advertising, web use? Can it be 3 dimentional, embossed, used as a sign?
Can it be even more 'heavenly', glowing? or reflective using silver metallic foil or matt and gloss UV varnish effects?
Or matt etching on a gloss glass bottle or vice-versa?
Nice!
Paul
I agree... please don't forget the brand territory work with the lines/dots, trust me it can be an incredible source of communication elements
Post a Comment
<< Home